Donald Trump Promised Not To Cut Social Security, But His Transition Team May Have Other Ideas

WASHINGTON ― President-elect Donald Trump pronounced during his discuss that he did not wish to cut Social Security benefits, though a Republicans he has hired to conduct a module have done no such commitment.

Tom Leppert, a Trump transition team’s point chairman on Social Security, has in a past advocated for privatizing and cutting a renouned retirement program. Leppert offering minute process positions that enclosed lifting a Social Security retirement age and partially privatizing a module when he ran for U.S. Senate in Texas 2012.

“Trump’s Social Security transition organisation is built with people who wish to cut and privatize a system,”said Nancy Altman, co-director of a organisation Social Security Works, that opposes advantage cuts, in an emailed statement. Trump pronounced he didn’t support slicing benefits, she noted.

“If he meant what he said, he needs to forgo and reinstate a Social Security appointees immediately,” Altman said.

Trump regularly pronounced during a discuss that he didn’t wish to disaster with Social Security benefits, that keep millions of comparison Americans out of poverty.

“It is my goal to leave Social Security as it is,” he pronounced in Mar during a Republican primary debate.

Social Security will not be means to compensate out full advantages in 2034 if Congress does zero to boost a program’s finances. Broadly speaking, progressives preference lifting income to tighten a long-term appropriation gap, while conservatives cite advantage reductions.

Trump pragmatic on a discuss route that reducing fraud and growing a economy would be adequate to seaside adult Social Security’s finances. Experts on all sides determine that conjunction of those techniques would be scarcely sufficient to residence a problem.

At slightest two other figures reserved to conduct a Social Security Administration transition are also long-time proponents of privatization and other advantage cuts.

Mike Korbey, who is streamer a SSA transition, according to an organizational chart of tip transition officials, is a former lobbyist who has advocated privatizing Social Security.

While lobbying for a regressive United Seniors Association in a mid-1990s, Korbey called Social Security “a unsuccessful system, damaged and bankrupt.’’

Korbey went on to offer as a comparison confidant to SSA’s emissary commissioner in a George W. Bush administration, where he promoted the afterwards president’s devise to privatize a program.

Dorcas Hardy, a commissioner of a SSA during a Reagan administration, is on a Trump administration’s SSA transition team, according to an email The Intercept obtained. Hardy called for privatizing Social Security while during a libertarian Cato Institute in 1995.

The Social Security Administration, a sovereign organisation that processes Social Security claims and sends out benefits, does not have a energy to reshape a program. It’s adult to Congress and a boss to make changes such as change benefits.

But as Korbey’s 2005 activism shows, SSA’s domestic appointees can use their roost to allege a sitting administration’s bulletin for a program. Naming officials like Leppert, Korbey and Hardy suggests that a Trump administration does not cruise Social Security cuts off limits, no matter how many times Trump promised not to hold it on a discuss trail.

The Trump transition did not respond to a ask for criticism on either Leppert, Korbey or Hardy’s roles indicated that Trump would not be gripping his discuss promise.

And Republicans in Congress have prolonged embraced slicing benefits, including by lifting Social Security’s retirement age, tinkering with a advantage formula, or privatizing a program. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Vice President-elect Mike Pence both upheld George W. Bush’ privatization pull in 2005. The bid fizzled amid temperate renouned support and Democratic charges that it would leave seniors vulnerable.

For his part, Ryan has pronounced he wants to prioritize privatizing Medicare, indicating that addressing Social Security is less urgent.

That is not interlude Democrats and their allies, however, from sounding a alarm about a hazard a Trump administration poses for Social Security as well.

Brad Woodhouse, executive of Americans United for Change, an advocacy organisation that supports Democrats, pronounced in an email a transition organisation makeup indicated Trump would preference slicing Social Security.

“If Trump’s new ‘point man’ on moulding process for a Social Security Administration is any clue, a American people will be astounded with a devise they didn’t opinion for to privatize a complement and let Wall Street play divided their hard-earned benefits, only as President Bush did in 2005,” Woodhouse said.

Do we work in a sovereign agency? Email us during [email protected] and let us know what you’re saying and hearing, and if you’re meditative of staying in supervision for a subsequent administration.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login